|
Press releases
|
Oyster
Bay Marlborough Vineyards Limited
OBV
24
Aug, 2007, 11:37
GENERAL
OBV
- Receipt of Legal Proceedings
|
Oyster
Bay Marlborough Vineyards Limited ("Oyster Bay") was today
served with legal proceedings issued by Peter Yealands Investments Limited
("PYIL") against Oyster Bay and Delegat's Wine Estate Limited
("Delegat's"). These proceedings are an attempt, in a different
form, to re-litigate PYIL's complaints about grape supply contracts and
grape prices that have already been put to, and dismissed by, NZX and the
Takeovers Panel.
PYIL's claim is that as a shareholder it is prejudiced because the affairs
of Oyster Bay have been, are being and will likely to continue to be
conducted in a manner which is oppressive, unfairly discriminatory and
unfairly prejudicial to PYIL. PYIL seeks a number of orders from the court
including that the contracts between Oyster Bay and Delegat's on which
Oyster Bay was formed be set aside, and that either Oyster Bay and/or
Delegat's acquire PYIL's shares in Oyster Bay for an above market price.
Ever since it became clear that PYIL's takeover bid for Oyster Bay would
fail, PYIL's only real objective has been to seek to have its 4.8% stake
in Oyster Bay bought out for an above market price, no matter the cost
that it puts Oyster Bay to.
Oyster Bay considers that the claim has no merit whatsoever and will fail.
That view is supported by the company's legal counsel.
Oyster Bay chairman, Bill Falconer, advises:
"PYIL has put Oyster Bay to considerable expense over the past two
years in a succession of largely unsuccessful complaints to NZX
Regulation, the Takeovers Panel, the Securities Commission and the High
Court in support of its ultimately unsuccessful offer for a controlling
interest in Oyster Bay. Since then PYIL's objective has been to attempt to
lever Oyster Bay or Delegat's into acquiring PYIL's shares at a price
significantly above market value - commonly known as "green
mail". First, PYIL persisted with an unsuccessful appeal to NZX
Discipline against the earlier finding of NZX Regulation (which cost
Oyster Bay around $175,000 of which only $54,000 was recovered), and now,
PYIL has issued these proceedings that have no merit, having first
indicated it would not do so if Oyster Bay or Delegat's purchased its
shares for a price significantly above market.
Oyster Bay could not buy back shares without shareholder approval, and its
directors would not put forward any proposition which preferred one
shareholder over, and at the expense of, others.
Oyster Bay's contractual relationship with Delegat's was fully known when
PYIL invested, and if PYIL did not like the structure it should not have
invested. PYIL stated during its takeover offer that it could not and
would not overturn Oyster Bay's contracts with Delegat's if successful,
and it is extraordinary that it should now seek court orders to secure
that outcome. The company has to conclude that the action is aimed simply,
but futilely, at securing leverage to force a buy out of its shares in
Oyster Bay .
Oyster Bay's costs claimed against PYIL from the takeover process total
around $600,000, which PYIL has declined to pay. Oyster Bay's endeavours
to settle this claim have been rebuffed because they have not been
accompanied by an offer to purchase PYIL's shares. Oyster Bay will now
pursue recovery of this amount in the High Court.
It is tragic for Oyster Bay's shareholders that they will bear substantial
further costs from PYIL's latest action, just to prove that it has no
merit. In the 2006 and 2007 financial years shareholders had to forfeit
around $1,050,000 (12 cents a share) to meet expenses caused by PYIL (some
of which Oyster Bay considers to be recoverable) which could otherwise
have been distributed as dividend, and it would be regrettable, following
this year's reduced harvest, if earnings next year were to be eroded again
by legal expenses.
The company would prefer to be allowed to get on with its business of
earning profit for shareholders from its vineyards. However, it will not
bow to pressure from a dissident shareholder seeking to prefer its
position at the expense of other shareholders. It will therefore defend
the proceedings. It looks forward to the finality which its expected
successful defence will bring."
>
OYSTER
BAY ANNOUNCES 2007 HARVEST RESULT
Oyster Bay Marlborough Vineyards Limited announces that it has concluded
negotiations for the sale of its 2007 grape harvest to Delegat's Wine
Estate Limited in accordance with the long term Grape Purchase Agreement
between the two companies.
The harvest this year totaled 4,206 tonnes, covering production of
chardonnay, pinot noir, riesling and sauvignon blanc varieties. This was
10 % lower than the 4,689 tonnes produced last year. Reductions of this
order, attributable to cold weather in December, are understood to have
been widely experienced by vineyards in Marlborough's Wairau Valley this
year.
Total revenue of $9.554 million was correspondingly 10 % down on last
year's $10.668 million. The average price of $2,272 per tonne, across all
varieties, was comparable to the $2,275 per tonne achieved last year.
The independent directors are certifying, and the company's independent
viticultural consultant, Dr David Jordan, is providing a report, to NZX
that they consider the prices received to be commercial, and fair to the
minority shareholders.
The independent directors are further certifying to NZX that the
negotiations were conducted on an arm's length basis. Given the related
party nature of the contract between Oyster Bay and Delegat's, the
independent directors are satisfied that their procedures were robust and
met the requirement for independence on their part.
The settlement of grape prices is a complex process addressing a wide
range of viticultural variables as well as the different situations of
buyers and sellers, and market dynamics may change as the season
progresses. Inevitably, this may result in the negotiating period
extending well into the season or, as was the case this year and last,
beyond the harvest, to allow the accumulation of fullest available
intelligence on market trends.
|
|
Chairman's
report
SUMMARY
OF PRELIMINARY FULL YEAR ANNOUNCEMENT Name of Listed
Issuer: Oyster Bay Marlborough Vineyards Limited
Results for announcement to the market
Reporting Period: 12 months to 30 June 2007
Previous Reporting Period: 12 months to 30 June 2006 This report has
been prepared in a manner which complies with generally accepted
accounting practice and gives a true and fair view of the matters to
which the report relates.
The financial statements attached to this report have been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers and are not subject to a qualification. A copy of
the audit report applicable to the full financial statements is attached
to this announcement.
The company has a formally constituted Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors. CONSOLIDATED OPERATING STATEMENT Current Full Year NZ$'000;
Up/Down %; Previous Corresponding Full Year NZ$'000 OPERATING REVENUE:
Trading revenue: $9,554; down 10%; $10,668
Other revenue:
$35; up 1,650%; $2
Total Operating revenue:
$9,589; down 10%; $10,670
OPERATING SURPLUS BEFORE TAX: $363; down 84%; $2,224 Less tax on
operating profit: $(31); down 104%; $745
Non-recurring costs/(recovery) after tax $(52); down 109%; $559
Net Surplus attributable to minority interests:
$0; $0
NET SURPLUS AFTER TAX ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREHOLDERS OF LISTED ISSUER:
$446; down 52%; $920
Earnings per share: 5.0 cps; down 51%; 10.2 cps
Net tangible assets per share:
$2.00; down 2%; $2.05
Final Dividend 5.0 cps; Record Date: 2 November 2007 Date Payable: 15
November 2007
Appendix 4 is attached.
Detailed information: The Preliminary Full Year Announcement is attached
Oyster Bay Marlborough Vineyards announces that it recorded a profit
after tax for the year ending 30 June 2007 of $446,000, compared with
$920,000 recorded in the previous year. This was attributable to a 10.3
percent reduction in harvest levels resulting from cool spring and early
summer weather conditions which reduced fruit set in three vineyards,
but also to higher frost protection costs and increased vineyard lease
costs.
As previously reported, Oyster Bay's total production for the year was
4,206 tonnes compared with 4,689 tonnes last year, generating revenue of
$9,554,000 compared with $10,668,000 last year. Average revenue per
tonne was $2,272.
Operating expenses were $7,426,000, an 11.0 percent increase on last
year's $6,691,000. The principal contributors were higher frost
protection costs ($305,000); lease costs ($388,000); and depreciation
charges ($261,000). Small reductions were registered for administration
costs, replanting and vineyard materials.
Legal costs associated with takeover related matters during the year
totaled $276,000 compared with $835,000 last year, and were offset by
insurance and cost recoveries of $354,000 relating to certain of the
legal costs incurred last year.
Consistent with the company's policy of distributing available
surpluses, the Directors have declared a dividend of 5 cents a share for
the year ended 30 June 2007. The record date for the dividend will be 2
November 2007, and the dividend will be paid on 15 November 2007.
The Directors are disappointed that the aftermath of the takeover action
in 2005 is still with us. We have endeavored,
unsuccessfully, to settle with Peter Yealands Investment Limited the
outstanding cost and compensation claims which are before the Court.
These claims will now proceed to litigation.
We are disappointed too, that the weather should have been adverse at a
time when we expected the Company to demonstrate its full earning
potential. It is no solace that much of the province experienced similar
production declines.
However, the vineyards are healthy and well managed, our replanting
programme is now complete, the demand for Marlborough wines continues to
grow in international markets, and we can look forward to a better
harvest next year. We welcome the appointment of Sandy Maier to the
Board to strengthen the independent director representation.
Any enquiries please contact Hon. Ruth Richardson on 03-3479146
|
|